Kovalcin Physics Homework #71

READER COMMENTS ON
"VIDEO - BREAKING: Government Releasing 9/11 Video of Pentagon Crash"
(589 Responses so far...)

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 5/16/2006 @ 9:53 am PT...


I can't wait to see this! Make sure you post the video, Brad. I bet it's not going to be clear.


COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 5/16/2006 @ 9:54 am PT...


What if it shows a cartoon plane hitting the pentagon?


COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
... Susan said on 5/16/2006 @ 9:58 am PT...


This should get interesting...


COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
... Peg C said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:13 am PT...


It should occur to everyone that four and a half years is plenty of time to dub up some "special effects." As with ALL public releases having to do with this "administration," the timing is highly suspect. I'm not one of those who subscribe to the "missile hit the Pentagon" theory, but I don't think a 757 did, either...


COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
... bedazzled patriotic redneck said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:25 am PT...


holy shit!!!

lets see what kind of exotic technology can vaporize a plane

911 truth seekers


COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
... Paul said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:27 am PT...


Well, it takes a few years to doctor a video, right?


COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
... Hidden Hand said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:35 am PT...


Yeah, I had heard some months back that this was going to happen, and of course, the big question is, why wait almost five years to show the recently renovated portion of the Pentagram getting hit?

And why were those intial frames that were released so obtuse and elusive, along with the incorrect date on the bottom? They didn't stop showing footage of the towers being hit over fear of offending the public's sensibilities, that's nonsense; they routinely manipulate and exploit the public's sensibilities. No, they stopped showing it on cable "news" because there are anomalies within that footage that doesn't jive with the official version of events.

Irregardless of what hit the Pentagram, there remains numerous red flags re 9/11 that no one wants to touch.


COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
... Susan said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:46 am PT...


C'mon guys, let's give the government some credit...After all, that kind of tediuos photoshopping isn't easy. I'm sure it took at least three years. Of course, after all that hard work they wanted to hold onto the video until just the right moment for release. Say...just prior to news of a Karl Rove indictment perhaps?

And of course they didn't want to influence the Moussaui trial. After all, they exhibited such judicious restraint with those 911 emergency call tapes and victims' families testimonies.

Geez you all sound so, so, so, I don't know, angry, perhaps?


COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:53 am PT...


COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
... PetGoat said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:55 am PT...


Woah, I came in here intending to post something
expressing pre-emptivce skepticism about the video's
veracity, thought I'd be way out in left field. I don't
claim to know what happened at the Pentagon, because
the information is just not available, but I'm not prepared
to rule out any of the theories yet.


COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:55 am PT...


COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
... Nicholas said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:57 am PT...


:crazy: Well Im not sure what to think NOW, untill I can actually see this for real, especially after watching CONFRONTING THE EVIDENCE: A CALL TO REOPEN THE 9/11 INVESTIGATION., (that had me totally questioning EVERYTHING this administration ever told was the truth, so I will remain as calm as possible till I see this then We can see if it can clear anything up for the millions of confused Americans.
The person that posted earlier are right though about this administration they are capable of anything.... .....Doctoring....ect.. If you want to see the CONFRONTING DVD special you can get a free copy of the dvd at the site: http://reopen911.org/index.htm or watch it at:
http://video.google.com/...362123&q=9/11+reopen


COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
... Paul said on 5/16/2006 @ 10:58 am PT...


I'm certainly angry about it, but I'm also very puzzled.

If 9/11 is SUCH a cut-and-dried case, why are we unable to get all the answers?

If 9/11 is pure fact and not fiction, why are the facts pointing more towards an alternate scenario than the ones we have been presented with?

I guess we must accept that we WERE attacked, no matter whom or how.

What should matter is how we have HANDLED this attack since.

1.) We've not caught the perpetrator, because we would have heard about it.

2.) Our administration in their infinite arrogance deflected our righteous anger against the perpetrator and spuriously attacked a dictator of another country that had nothing to do with this crime.

3.) We have let the shadow of terrorism forever erode our civil liberties and nearly destroyed the very fabric of who we are as a people.

Luckily Americans have a deep-seeded distrust and disdain for government, so while it may take us some time, we eventually throw the bums out.

We know we were attacked, it doesn't matter right now who did it and why. What should matter to us now, is our response. And we MUST make the response clear in November if we have any hopes in turning back this blood-red tide of paranoia and fear.

Do I hear an "Amen!", brothers and sisters?


COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
... loretta said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:02 am PT...


This had better be good. It better demonstrate how the plane hit flying only about 20' above the pristine lawn, how it burrowed through 3 concrete reinforced rings, how it only left a 16' hole, how the wings, tail and 2 nine-foot diameter engines obliterated into microscopic fragments. The plane better be white and not gray, since that piece of scrap (photgraphed in about 5 different places) was white with a red A on it.

If it's not crystal clear what happened, it won't change a thing.


COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
... Robert Lockwood Mills said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:06 am PT...


On another blog the question arose, "How could a Boeing 727 (737?) plane make only a 12-foot wide crater in the Pentagon wall on both entry and departure?" Answer given: "The wings folded against the fuselage on impact."

Question: "Assuming this happened, and the width of the two wings were added to the width of the fuselage from that point backward, would this come to only 12 feet?" Seems to me it would be 20 feet, at least.


COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
... Hidden Hand said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:07 am PT...


Sounds like it's a ruse. Just watched Pete Williams on MSNBC saying that all you're going to see is a "different angle" of those same still photos that were released earlier on - and of course ZERO mention of that incorrect date (Sept 12th!) at the bottom - and that you can see "the tip of the plane," but, he said, and this is revealing, probably not enough to satisfy those "conspiracy theorists."

Uh-huh. Exactly. Guess we'll wait and see...


COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
... Ricky said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:07 am PT...


Do you people realize how ridiculous you sound? That fact that you actually believe thsi crap your spewing is unreal. Its pointless to try and convince you otherwise since people as crazy as yourselves are too far for reality to cause concern.

As sad as it is to read the continual pro-terrorist, anti American discussion, it ensures my parties domination of American government.

I feel sorry for you all, but thank you greatly for making Democrats look so bad.


COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:10 am PT...


I always knew this day would come when new video of this would be released. Hopefully this will silence the tin foil hat crowd that thinks a missle hit the Pentagon.


COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
... PetGoat said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:11 am PT...


I've been trying to think what Carl Rove would do to try
to do the most damage to the 911truthists.

And I'm wondering if releasing a fakey-looking video of
flight 77 would serve his interests: All the truthists would
get on board saying the video was fakey, and then the
Bushcists could say "See, that eholr bunch of loonies
thinks the Pentagon was hit with a missile!"


COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
... PetGoat said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:12 am PT...


Sorry, "eholr" is typoese for "whole"


COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
... Hidden Hand said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:14 am PT...


Go fuck yourself Ricky. And then read Paul Thompson's Timeline, and David Ray Griffin's two books on the subject. And then ask yourself: why did the Commission not address so many things, including the towers' central steel columns, the PNAC, Larry Silverstein's admission of "pulling" tower #7, and in fact, the Commission never even mentions tower #7 - a 47 story skyscraper collapses, the owner admits it was "pulled" on camera, and they don't mention it once in their findings. 9/11 was a false flag psyop needed as the required justification for further expansion of empire which necessitates rolling back civil liberties.

And forget about dems - why are members of former REPUBLICAN admin's lending their names to the 9/11 Truth Movement?


COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:15 am PT...


If no plane hit the Pentagon, can somebody from the tin foil hat crowd tell me (and the families) where the people on that plane are. I'd love to hear this...


COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:16 am PT...


Judicial Watch. Org must have crashed...


COMMENT #24 [Permalink]
... Hidden Hand said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:27 am PT...


Jeff, the Truth Movement isn't about trying to prove what happened, it's about revealing omissions and implausibilities within the "official" version. And where there are lies and omissions, there is a cover up. Where there's a cover up, someone is lying. From there, it's the classic question of motive: who benefits, and why?

I'm unsure of what hit the Pentagram, although I fail to see how the enormous wing and tail span of a 757 could not leave impressions in the wall - which, before the roof collapsed later, had only a 16 ft wide hole in it.

http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html


COMMENT #25 [Permalink]
... Nicholas said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:29 am PT...


Ricky just shows how Naive he is, not to mention UNAMERICAN & UNPATRIOTIC. To just accept what ever he is told & not DEMAND that the truth be told, so far the bush administration has done nothing but mislead America, nevermind done Zero about investigating 9/11 fully , DO YOUR HOMEWORK ricky then come back & cry when the democrates win by a LANDSLIDE this nov. ,because the bush administration is made up of incompetant liars & ruined the Repulicans name . Further more I saw nobody here mention any political affilation to any party, so GROW would you.
http://video.google.com/...362123&q=9/11+reopen


COMMENT #26 [Permalink]
... Nicholas said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:31 am PT...


Ricky just shows how Naive he is, not to mention UNAMERICAN & UNPATRIOTIC. To just accept what ever he is told & not DEMAND that the truth be told, so far the bush administration has done nothing but mislead America, nevermind done Zero about investigating 9/11 fully , DO YOUR HOMEWORK ricky then come back & cry when the democrates win by a LANDSLIDE this nov. ,because the bush administration is made up of incompetant liars & ruined the Repulicans name . Further more I saw nobody here mention any political affilation to any party, so GROW UP would you.
http://video.google.com/...362123&q=9/11+reopen


COMMENT #27 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:31 am PT...


If a plane did not hit the Pentagon, where are the people who were on board Flight 77? Are they part of the conspiracy?

If not a plane, then what?


COMMENT #28 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:33 am PT...


Who has seen or has access to the new video?


COMMENT #29 [Permalink]
... Nicholas said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:38 am PT...


(K)arl Rove will hopefully by indicted!

Dont forget bush needs his Ratings up, they will try anything.

Jeff makes some excellent points.


COMMENT #30 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:42 am PT...


I'm willing to consider anything but until somebody can explain where the people on Flight 77 went and why their charred remains were found at the Pentagon, I'm gonna have to say...A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON!!


COMMENT #31 [Permalink]
... big dan said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:44 am PT...


Jeff: Who ARE the people that were supposedly aboard the pentagon flight. Do you have a list of names???


COMMENT #32 [Permalink]
... Jerrod said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:47 am PT...


Man that website must be getting some crazy web traffic, no way their servers can handle it.


COMMENT #33 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:47 am PT...


AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 77
American Airlines Flight 77, from Washington to Los Angeles, crashed into the Pentagon with 64 people aboard.

CREW

Charles Burlingame of Herndon, Virginia, was the plane's captain. He is survived by a wife, a daughter and a grandson. He had more than 20 years of experience flying with American Airlines and was a former U.S. Navy pilot.

David Charlebois, who lived in Washington's Dupont Circle neighborhood, was the first officer on the flight. "He was handsome and happy and very centered," his neighbor Travis White, told The Washington Post. "His life was the kind of life I wanted to have some day."

Michele Heidenberger of Chevy Chase, Maryland, was a flight attendant for 30 years. She left behind a husband, a pilot, and a daughter and son.

Flight attendant Jennifer Lewis, 38, of Culpeper, Virginia, was the wife of flight attendant Kenneth Lewis.

Flight attendant Kenneth Lewis, 49, of Culpeper, Virginia, was the husband of flight attendant Jennifer Lewis.

Renee May, 39, of Baltimore, Maryland, was a flight attendant.

PASSENGERS

Paul Ambrose, 32, of Washington, was a physician who worked with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the surgeon general to address racial and ethnic disparities in health. A 1995 graduate of Marshall University School of Medicine, Ambrose last year was named the Luther Terry Fellow of the Association of Teachers of Preventative Medicine.

Yeneneh Betru, 35, was from Burbank, California.

M.J. Booth

Bernard Brown, 11, was a student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. He was embarking on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

Suzanne Calley, 42, of San Martin, California, was an employee of Cisco Systems Inc.

William Caswell

Sarah Clark, 65, of Columbia, Maryland, was a sixth-grade teacher at Backus Middle School in Washington. She was accompanying a student on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

Asia Cottom, 11, was a student at Backus Middle School in Washington. Asia was embarking on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

James Debeuneure, 58, of Upper Marlboro, Maryland, was a fifth-grade teacher at Ketcham Elementary School in Washington. He was accompanying a student on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

Rodney Dickens, 11, was a student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. He was embarking on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

Eddie Dillard

Charles Droz

Barbara Edwards, 58, of Las Vegas, Nevada, was a teacher at Palo Verde High School in Las Vegas.

Charles S. Falkenberg, 45, of University Park, Maryland, was the director of research at ECOlogic Corp., a software engineering firm. He worked on data systems for NASA and also developed data systems for the study of global and regional environmental issues. Falkenburg was traveling with his wife, Leslie Whittingham, and their two daughters, Zoe, 8, and Dana, 3.

Zoe Falkenberg, 8, of University Park, Maryland, was the daughter of Charles Falkenberg and Leslie Whittingham.

Dana Falkenberg, 3, of University Park, Maryland, was the daughter of Charles Falkenberg and Leslie Whittingham.

Joe Ferguson was the director of the National Geographic Society's geography education outreach program in Washington. He was accompanying a group of students and teachers on an educational trip to the Channel Islands in California. A Mississippi native, he joined the society in 1987. "Joe Feguson's final hours at the Geographic reveal the depth of his commitment to one of the things he really loved," said John Fahey Jr., the society's president. "Joe was here at the office until late Monday evening preparing for this trip. It was his goal to make this trip perfect in every way."

Wilson "Bud" Flagg of Millwood, Virginia, was a retired Navy admiral and retired American Airlines pilot.

Dee Flagg

Richard Gabriel

Ian Gray, 55, of Washington was the president of a health-care consulting firm.

Stanley Hall, 68, was from Rancho Palos Verdes, California.

Bryan Jack, 48, of Alexandria, Virginia, was a senior executive at the Defense Department.

Steven D. "Jake" Jacoby, 43, of Alexandria, Virginia, was the chief operating officer of Metrocall Inc., a wireless data and messaging company.

Ann Judge, 49, of Virginia was the travel office manager for the National Geographic Society. She was accompanying a group of students and teachers on an educational trip to the Channel Islands in California. Society President John Fahey Jr. said one of his fondest memories of Judge is a voice mail she and a colleague once left him while they were rafting the Monkey River in Belize. "This was quintessential Ann --- living life to the fullest and wanting to share it with others," he said.

Chandler Keller, 29, was a Boeing propulsion engineer from El Segundo, California.

Yvonne Kennedy

Norma Khan, 45, from Reston, Virginia was a nonprofit organization manager.

Karen A. Kincaid, 40, was a lawyer with the Washington firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding. She joined the firm in 1993 and was part of the its telecommunications practice. She was married to Peter Batacan.

Norma Langsteuerle

Dong Lee

Dora Menchaca, 45, of Santa Monica, California, was the associate director of clinical research for a biotech firm.

Christopher Newton, 38, of Anaheim, California, was president and chief executive officer of Work-Life Benefits, a consultation and referral service. He was married and had two children. Newton was on his way back to Orange County to retrieve his family's yellow Labrador, who had been left behind until they could settle into their new home in Arlington, Virginia.

Barbara Olson, 45, was a conservative commentator who often appeared on CNN and was married to U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson. She twice called her husband as the plane was being hijacked and described some details, including that the attackers were armed with knives. She had planned to take a different flight, but she changed it at the last minute so that she could be with her husband on his birthday. She worked as an investigator for the House Government Reform Committee in the mid-1990s and later worked on the staff of Senate Minority Whip Don Nickles.

Ruben Ornedo, 39, of Los Angeles, California, was a Boeing propulsion engineer.

Robert Penniger, 63, of Poway, California, was an electrical engineer with BAE Systems.

Lisa Raines, 42, was senior vice president for government relations at the Washington office of Genzyme, a biotechnology firm. She was from Great Falls, Virginia, and was married to Stephen Push. She worked with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on developing a new policy governing cellular therapies, announced in 1997. She also worked on other major health-care legislation.

Todd Reuben, 40, of Potomac, Maryland, was a tax and business lawyer.

John Sammartino

Diane Simmons

George Simmons

Mari-Rae Sopper of Santa Barbara, California, was a women's gymnastics coach at the University of California at Santa Barbara. She had just gotten the post August 31 and was making the trip to California to start work.

Bob Speisman, 47, was from Irvington, New York.

Hilda Taylor was a sixth-grade teacher at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. She was accompanying a student on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society.

Leonard Taylor was from Reston, Virginia.

Leslie A. Whittington, 45, was from University Park, Maryland. The professor of public policy at Georgetown University in Washington was traveling with her husband, Charles Falkenberg, 45, and their two daughters, Zoe, 8, and Dana, 3. They were traveling to Los Angeles to catch a connection to Australia. Whittington had been named a visiting fellow at Australian National University in Canberra.

John Yamnicky, 71, was from Waldorf, Maryland.

Vicki Yancey

Shuyin Yang

Yuguag Zheng


COMMENT #34 [Permalink]
... plunger said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:53 am PT...


CNN just aired it. They tried their damndest to tell viewers that they were seeing an aircraft hit the building, but in fact, the video showed no plane.

Jamie McIntyre was on hand to tell viewers that he was there that day and took pictures of the cockpit, pieces of the plane - etc. - but it was all a lie.

The video showed no plane.


COMMENT #35 [Permalink]
... Nicholas said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:54 am PT...


Jeff
The points I have always had trouble with were: Where did the plane & people go? Other than that, the official "CONSPIRACY" story by the 9/11 commision stinks of OMMISIONS & COVER UPS Ect ect....
Just for fun watch the other conspiracy version of the story alot of it makes MUCH more sense that what they want us to belive is true:
View with link below:

http://video.google.com/...362123&q=9/11+reopen


COMMENT #36 [Permalink]
... Jeff said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:56 am PT...


I am as distrustful of the Bush Administration as anyone else out there with a critical thought in their head but to those of you out there who think they would doctor videos to show a plane hitting the Pentagon, why wouldn't they have planted WMD's in Iraq if they are so inclined to lie and make up evidence?


COMMENT #37 [Permalink]
... me said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:57 am PT...


"I am as distrustful of the Bush Administration as anyone else out there with a critical thought in their head but to those of you out there who think they would doctor videos to show a plane hitting the Pentagon, why wouldn't they have planted WMD's in Iraq if they are so inclined to lie and make up evidence?"

Damn.....that's a good question.


COMMENT #38 [Permalink]
... Ayaya said on 5/16/2006 @ 11:57 am PT...


I just saw the video on BBC News 24. It's pathetic and shows nothing we haven't seen before. It starts with the explosion already underway then we see the smoke until it loops around again.

Seriously disappointing.


COMMENT #39 [Permalink]
... plunger said on 5/16/2006 @ 12:00 pm PT...


Raytheon and 9/11

2001-09-11 Stanley Hall Raytheon Director of Electronic warfare program management. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 77, the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon but did not.

2001-09-11 Peter Gay Raytheon VP of Electronic Systems on special assignment at the El Segundo, CA division office where the Global Hawk UAV remote control system is made. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 Kenneth Waldie Raytheon Senior Quality Control for Electronic Systems. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 David Kovalcin Raytheon Senior Mechanical Engineer for Electronic Systems. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 Herbert Homer Raytheon Corporate Executive working with the Department of Defense. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on United airlines Flight 175, the one that supposedly hit the South World Trade Tower II.

These are not only the type of people but they are the people that would be assigned to UAV type projects involving Mode 4 and Mode 5 upgrades. Why would they be in Boston and those planes coming from that direction and from north of Manhattan Island?

That 16 foot tunnel through three rings of the Pentagon is only made by a directional blast weapon. Rumsfeld has even slipped up and mentioned the missile that hit the Pentagon.

Some have seen the Pentagon parking lot camera video and the white trail of smoke. Jets do now leave white trails of smoke at sea level, but Thiokol powered AGMs do, at all attitudes.


COMMENT #40 [Permalink]
... Paul said on 5/16/2006 @ 12:08 pm PT...


I just saw the "video" myself, and the CNN reporter just now said something that I wonder if anyone else caught.

She said it looked as though the plane hit the wall straight-on. It did not touch the ground; it did not drop from above at any kind of angle.

We're talking about piloting a rather large piece of aircraft such that it is able to smash into an area above the ground, yet not damage the roof. That can't be more than a 20-30 foot high target!

There is no way someone could "pilot" a commercial jetliner to just that exact spot. Especially not someone who supposedly came from Saudi Arabia and trained to fly jets.

He would have had to be a "Top Gun" at Miramar to pull off this amazing feat.

And I assure you, Miramar screens applicants better than anyone in the world.


COMMENT #41 [Permalink]
... Susan said on 5/16/2006 @ 12:15 pm PT...


Jeff,
Please refer to the website
http://911research.wtc7....essays/pentagontrap.html
for a better understanding of where we whackos are coming from. I don't know what happened to Flight 77. It probably hit the Pentagon. But there really are many unanswered questions from that day. The biggest question for me is the collapse of WTC7. See
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html
and please do watch the available videos of the collapse at that link.

This website I am referring you to really does seem to have the most balanced perspective regarding the questions and the inconsistencies. It is hard to ask these questions. But to ignore them would be irreprehensible. Ricky's response is like many other peoples. I can only respond with "Thou doth protest too much."

I do want to say that questioning the official version of what happened was a gradual process for me. There is so much crap and disinformation out there discrediting those who have legitimate questions. Just refer to the family steering committee and they're questions.

This is a difficult topic. I understand your skepticism.


COMMENT #42 [Permalink]
... agent99 said on 5/16/2006 @ 12:20 pm PT...


I have heard a number of times that Valerie Plame Wilson was working on WMD matters in the Middle East, and a couple of times I heard that she succeeded in stopping a shipment of something that was likely on its way to be the plant in Iraq.

Their numbers are so low that we can expect all manner of irritating and awful things to come from them now, including finally "finding" WMD in Iraq, including saying they're releasing proof of a plane hitting the Pentagon which isn't proof of a plane hitting the Pentagon. They know that just SAYING this stuff makes many, many people believe it.

Ricky, no typos today, and actual sentences in English. Have you been doing your English homework? Good boy.


COMMENT #43 [Permalink]
... brian said on 5/16/2006 @ 12:21 pm PT...

Он тихонько толкнул дверь, и та отворилась. Беккер с трудом сдержал крик ужаса. Меган сидела на унитазе с закатившимися вверх глазами. В центре лба зияло пулевое отверстие, из которого сочилась кровь, заливая лицо.

0 thoughts on “Kovalcin Physics Homework #71

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *